investment check Field-deployable across continents Paris  ·  Singapore Industrial  ·  Infrastructures Full-stack profiles : industrial x finance

The Reality Check
your investment
deserves.

We provide independent assessment, counter-expertise and support for your industrial and infrastructure investment decisions before you commit.

You are :

PE & Infra Funds Co-investors Industrial Boards Sovereign Wealth Lenders Family Offices
Pain Points

Investment decisions are only as strong as the assumptions behind them.
Assumptions are strong only when understood through field and technical reality.

−5pts IRR

Is a likely profitability loss of a 200M$ industrial investment experiencing an 18-month schedule overrun, assuming a 3-year build, 15-year operation and 15% target IRR. That is ~40M$ of NPV destroyed.

Observed: average delay across 500+ projects above 100M$ is 52% of initial timeline.

McKinsey Capital Projects, 2022
−3pts IRR

Is a likely profitability loss of a 30M$ industrial asset suffering a +25% cost overrun, bringing total investment to 37.5M$with unchanged revenues, assuming a 15% target IRR. That is +7.5M$ of unplanned capital.

Observed: fewer than 45% of capital projects finish within 10% of authorized budget.

IPA, 24,000+ capital projects
+6pts IRR

The typical gain observed for well-defined compared to poorly-defined industrial CAPEX plan. Strongest driver : the quality of front-end challenge, definition and risk assessment before authorization. This is where we operate.

IPA, 24,000+ capital projects
Services

Four approach from independent eye to on-the-ground steering.

I
Sanity Check

Second Opinion

You have a technical case. You want an independent eye before going further. We review the documentation, challenge the key assumptions and give you a clear, unfiltered read : a sharp, structured contradiction of what is on the table, with a confidence assessment on the investment's risk and return profile.

  • Organized Peer Review
  • Feedbacks & Alerts
  • Priorities
  • Cost Structure
  • Project Structure
  • BP Assumptions
  • Technical & Execution Assumptions
  • Critical Path
  • Investment Confidence Level
II
Hands-on review

Stress Test

We get hands-on. Beyond reviewing, we rework the structure: challenging the cost breakdown, stress-testing profitability under alternative scenarios, and quantifying what the business plan does not show. We rebuild the risk picture so your committee can decide on facts, not assumptions.

  • Make-or-Buy
  • WBS Restructuring
  • What-If Scenarios
  • Sensitivity Analysis
  • Risk Quantification
  • Uncertainty Measurement
  • Profitability Stress Test
  • Contingency Adequacy
  • Revised BP Assumptions
III
On-site deployment

Red Team

We deploy on-site. An independent team sent where the asset is, to confront the technical case with ground-level reality. We see what documents cannot show. We find what project teams do not report. This is not a desk exercise. This is a field diagnostic.

  • On-site
  • Maturity Assessment
  • Site and Teams Readiness
  • Organisation Maturity
  • Brownfield check
  • Configuration Audit
  • Requirements Traceability
  • Stakeholder Alignment Check
  • Ground Truth Report
IV
Governance integration

Corrective Roadmap

Something is drifting. We diagnose the root gaps and build the path back to a controlled, profitable trajectory : a structured corrective plan your organisation can execute immediately. When needed, we integrate with top management to drive its deployment from the inside.

  • Root Cause Diagnosis
  • Prioritised Action Plan
  • Quick Wins
  • Governance Structuring
  • Stakeholder Management
  • Milestone Framework
  • Ownership Assignment
  • Recovery KPIs
  • On-site Steering
  • Management Integration
— Engagement —

Tell us about the asset, the timeline, and the decision.

Get in Touch